Promoting the Abuse of Young Women
March 20, 2009
The real damage caused by the Luv Gov Elliot Spitzer has little to do with his career, his wife or his children.
Sadly, but predictably, the real damage caused by Spitzer once again falls heavily on the shoulders of middle class working Americans. You know...the same people that liberal hypocrites like Spitzer and his wife are always pandering to...and vowing to protect.
This is little different from the Clinton-Lewinsky mess.
In both cases you have narcissistic liberal politicians who, when given the sacred trust of the electorate, chose to abuse that sacred trust for self-satisfaction.
In both cases you have liberal scumbags whose Ivy League law school educated spouses portend to be passionate about helping children.
In both cases you have these “high powered” wives who, once their husbands are caught with their pants down, become more concerned about political and legal damage control than what has been wantonly wrought upon America’s youth. Those same “children” their campaign machines promote as the center focus of these political wives’ concern.
Somehow they serendipitously go from standing by “the children” to standing by their man and all the benefits derived therefrom.
It’s not as though F. Scott Fitzgerald didn’t warn us about this game over eighty years ago in the Great Gatsby, “They were careless people...they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made."
When Bill Clinton, in 1998, sanctified oral sex as not sex nor immoral (it was only “inappropriate”) to save his butt in the Lewinsky scandal, the president of the United States (at the time) set an example for the youth of this nation...and apparently his “high profile” Ivy league educated lawyer wife agreed with him.
Not only did she not condemn his behavior and rationale...she and her surrogates supported it and the message it sent our nation’s youth...oral sex is not sex, it is “a vast right-wing conspiracy”.
In 2005, the NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics) reported a shocking increase in the number of American teenagers practicing oral sex (more than 50% of American teenagers form 15 to 19 and 70% from 18 to 19).
Kelly Boggs of the Baptist Press noted that, “It was Clinton’s escapades with Monica Lewinsky that made oral sex a household topic in 1998. The teens targeted in the NCHS survey were between 8 and 12 years old when the story was being discussed daily on television and radio...There is no doubt that the popularity of the topic at the time...helped to contribute to the attitudes of many of today’s teenagers.”
Additionally, in 2007, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that, “Patients who had a lifetime number of 6 or more oral-sex partners were 3.4 times more likely to have oropharyngeal (throat) cancer.”
The Clintons recklessly careen through two presidential terms and retire from office to: make 10s of $millions; see their prep school educated daughter graduate from Stanford; get Hillary elected to the U.S. Senate and run for the presidency part deux.
A post-coital Monica Lewinsky rises from the obscurity of a porky mediocre rich girl to being a “famous” porky mediocre rich girl. Just another good example to live by...Want to be famous? Just fill your mouth with anything except the pearls of wisdom.
Meanwhile, the teenagers of America conclude (by presidential example) that oral sex is not sex (and even somewhat presidential) and increased their odds of getting throat cancer by over 300%.
America’s working parents thank Mr. and Mrs. Clinton for their “leadership” example.
And the same can be said for the Wall-Spitzers.
A very hypocritical and pathetic Governor Spitzer literally gets caught with his pants down for a nothing special hooker and America suffers phantom disgrace pains with the abused spouse, Harvard Law School graduate Silda Wall Spitzer.
Simultaneously, the obscure nobody hooker, Kristen, aka Ashley Youmans aka Ashley Alexandra Dupre, went from being an obscure hooker to “famous”.
This teenage runaway, or whatever she was, is now off her back and on her way to being wealthy. Her music downloads are moving over the internet at maximum price while multi-million dollar contract offers roll in (object lesson...VICE PAYS).
With the ever faithful Silda by his side, Spitzer apologized for something unmentioned to the electorate while simultaneously trying to plea bargain (with the best lawyers his Daddy’s $500 million can buy) the governorship of New York in exchange for immunity from prosecution for a number of felonies.
Try that some day. Try offering a federal prosecutor your bank clerk position in exchange for a free pass on an embezzling charge.
Even when forced to resign the governorship, the loyal Silda stood silently by his side. Maybe she was thinking of the non-profit she founded, Children for Children, whose mission is, “...to foster community involvement and social responsibility in young people....”
All this from a former NY Attorney General who sued a travel agency because “through its actions (it) promotes prostitution and the abuse of young women” and his wife whose passion is supposedly teaching children “responsibility”.
Another great example for the young people of America...Only take responsibility to the extent that you are forced into it and just keep saying you’re sorry for something never named.
It’s just a bunch of crap.
Between the Clintons and the Wall-Spitzers you have four Ivy League law school degrees. Do you really believe that an Ivy League law school graduate is so naïve and clueless that she can sleep with the same man for 20 years and have no idea that something is horribly wrong?
Would it be so hard for this “this Harvard-trained lawyer who suspended her high-profile career to raise Spitzer's children and support his political ambitions” to take a stand for the children of this country and condemn the actions of both her husband and “Kristen”?
For that matter, would it not be something you would have expected from the First Lady who, now, would be president?
Is it unreasonable to expect “leaders” to do something unselfish in the public good?
These people might be rich and politically powerful but just under that veneer, they are pathetic weaklings.
What, besides a pathetic weakling, could have the chance to change history for the better and not get their head out of their pants?
What am I saying...Fitzgerald has already said it for me...
Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born rich, it is very difficult to understand. They think, deep in their hearts, that they are better than we are because we had to discover the compensations and refuges of life for ourselves. Even when they enter deep into our world or sink below us, they still think that they are better than we are. They are different.
RightPage